Monthly Archives: August 2022

“Navy won’t back away from Taiwan in wake of Chinese belligerence, White House says,” Stars and Stripes: Geostrategery and world history classrooms

“ABOARD THE USS RONALD REAGAN, Philippine Sea – The U.S. 7th Fleet will send more aircraft and warships past Taiwan in the coming weeks, a response to China’s military exercises that have surrounded the island starting Thursday, according to the White House … The Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group will also remain in the region to “monitor the situation” as Beijing continues its exercises in the wake of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s mid-week stop in Taiwan, national security spokesman John Kirby said at a White House press conference Thursday … China that day began a series of air force and naval exercises, including 11 ballistic missiles fired toward Taiwan, five of which came down in Japan’s economic exclusion zone east of the island democracy.

“We condemn these actions, which are irresponsible and at odds with our longstanding goal of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and in the region,” Kirby said. “China has chosen to overreact and use the speaker’s visit as a pretext to increase provocative military activity in and around the Taiwan Strait.” https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2022-08-05/taiwan-navy-ronald-reagan-carrier-6886874.html

The paradox of the 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis is that the ultranationalist and divisive dictator Xi is accelerating the timetable for Japanese and American military officers to return to Taiwan Republic. For the broader global and world history level forces at work see my previous posts on the characteristics of America as a global maritime empire. Also little noted in western press: The American general in charge of US forces in South Korea recently stated US forces in Korea respond to a Taiwan crisis rapidly. One would have already guessed so but a very unusual public statement. Last year during the vaccine crisis in Taiwan manufactured by the China CCP-KMT three American senators made an unusual direct flight from a US military base in ROK, on a gigantic C-17, directly to Songshan Air Force Base, Taipei. Very rapid shifting landscape for sure, with decades of rules and practices being shattered by all sides. It may be time to question the use of the phrase “status quo.” Or at least redefine what we all mean by it. 7.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

It was never about Speaker Pelosi or Taiwan Republic – the 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis is about the rise and decline of great powers World history and geostrategery classrooms

The superficial, episodic narrative focuses on Speaker Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan Republic and the subsequent Chinese communist belligerence. This has always primarily been about the end of Globalization 1.0, and the partial decoupling between the American-led democratic economies and autocratic economies. This is also about dictator Xi reexamining just how much global connectivity and acceptance of the US-led global order pose a direct threat to his dictatorship.

I am certain American and Japanese military officers will soon return to Taiwan Republic because of world history level forces converging:

  1. The decoupling of the Chinese communist and American economy and the end of Globalization 1.0. The era where capital recognizes no political borders and geoeconomic policies do not consider national security-vital national interests are over.
  2. The developmental bottleneck and dictatorship challenging the economic crisis in communist China.
  3. The nature of the global maritime empire created and maintained by the US Navy I have written about. 4. The trickiest – relative decline of American hegemon, and the incomplete rise of Putin’s Russia and Xi’s communist China.

Throughout world history, we have had many examples of the decline and rise of great powers. Never before have we had a true global hegemon – the US, and its relative decline and the incomplete rise of would-be successors. The closest historical precedence is the UK to the US in 1945, and I have always suspected the American narrative on that transition is far more benign than how the UK remembers it. That precedence had two powers sort of speaking the same language, with relatively similar political and political-economic systems. And even then it took a horrific world war and a decades-long Cold War for the transition from one power to another to complete. We are sailing uncharted waters – little to no historical precedence to call on for lessons.

Japanese and American military officers will return to Taiwan because the ultranationalist and divisive hardliner Xi has demonstrated with this crisis he has manufactured that war is not theoretical. It is also clear that any conflict will not be confined by the Chinese communists just to Taiwan. What the Putin invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated is that dictators do not negotiate – and they never abide by treaties and agreements. Remember how many meetings western leaders had with Putin before the invasion? And the common illusion that somehow Russian belligerence is confined to Ukraine alone, and Chinese communist ambitions are confined to Taiwan Republic and nowhere else, is, even if we merely take Putin and Xi at their own words, absolutely mistaken. Once DC foreign policy establishment transitions from the old mentality – focusing on not provoking China, believing that there is a way to for a win-win compromise with Beijing and Moscow – into this new reality, both Tokyo and DC will realize that it is more dangerous to their vital national interests to not have a military presence in Taiwan.

Few examples: using this present Chinese communist missile crisis as a model for how a war against China will be engaged. There will be high intensity, high speed, multidimensional coordination of multinational forces in the air, in space, on land, at sea, and submerged – with homeland defense, cyber defense, logistics, civil defense – coordination of information warfare, banking, central banks, energy, food, medical, public health, etc. Where are the Taiwanese surface-to-air and surface-to-sea missile corridors? How should the American and Japanese forces coordinate? In what ways would the three nations plus others coordinate to maximize their impact on the Chinese communist forces? Without Japanese and American officers in Taiwan ahead of time, such coordination is impossible. Not only will officers from Japan and America return to Taiwan to act as liaisons and advisors – and they could well take the gentler AIT ‘recently/temporarily retired’ model. I think small to midsized Taiwanese military units will rotate to Japan and Guam/Hawaii for training with American and Japanese units, and vice versa.

In the grand scheme of things, we have entered the phase where because of the global maritime empire imperative, and because of the dangers posed by a declining hegemon and an incomplete rising power, planning for a war against China is no longer theoretical. Taiwan is a focus, but this is an Indo-Pacific struggle – between global democracies and global autocracies. How to deter-prevent a Chinese communist invasion, while retooling the global economic order to minimize democracies funding autocracies, will be the focus of this global struggle for many decades to come. 8.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Geostrategery classroom: US to take part in military exercise near India’s disputed border with China

Geostrategery classroom: US to take part in military exercise near India’s disputed border with China

“(CNN)The United States is to take part in a joint military exercise with India less than 100 kilometers (62 miles) from the South Asian country’s disputed border with China. The military drills will be held in mid-October at an altitude of 10,000 feet in Auli in the Indian state of Uttarakhand and will focus on high-altitude warfare training, according to a senior Indian Army officer with knowledge of the matter. Auli is about 95 kilometers from the Line of Actual Control (LAC), an inhospitable piece of land where the disputed border between India and China is roughly demarcated. The drills will take place as part of the 18th edition of an annual joint exercise known as “Yudh Abhyas” — or “War Practice”.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/08/06/india/india-us-military-exercise-line-of-actual-control-china-intl-hnk/index.html

Important to understand this report alongside recent US Forces RoK General’s comments on his forces’ ability to respond to Chinese communist aggression against the Taiwan Republic and its allies, and public statements on Taiwan’s defense and the Chinese communists’ belligerence from the admiral in charge of the Indo-Pacific command, and the admiral in charge of the US Seventh Fleet.

Study the Indo-Pacific map and see US strategic bombers from Diego Garcia and communist China’s soft underbelly; US carriers in the Indian Ocean; US naval base in Singapore choking off petroleum shipment to the Chinese communists; US-Japan-Australia AUKUS nucular submarines in the South and East Seas; strategic bombers and submarines in Guam and the West Pacific; US forces in Okinawa/Japan and RoK able to strike Chinese communist naval, amphibious units and remove Chinese command and control, supplies, logistics lines from the Sino-Soviet border all the way down to the Vietnam-China border.

Then notice just in one week: US-South Korea talks on additional THAAD. US-Japan and Taiwan Republic strengthening missile defense and military collaboration. US-Taiwan-Japan naval and coast guard units in the South Pacific. US-led multinational maneuvers in Indonesia. US-Japan-Korea (and Taiwan?) missile defense maneuvers. Reports that the US is strengthening missile defense at Guam. The return of French and German and UK military forces into the Indo-Pacific.

The historical irony created by divisive hardliner dictator Putin and ultra-ethnonationalist controversial dictator Xi is in their choosing policies that produce the exact opposite results to their stated goals. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has enhanced Ukrainian national identity while making it possible for Finland and Sweden to join NATO. Xi and the Chinese communists in their 1996 missile tantrum accelerated the US-Taiwan-Japan military alliance, and the 2022 Chinese communist missile tantrum will only further solidify this military alliance. 8.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Geostrategery, Geoeconomics, and world history classrooms: It’s the Economy, stupid

“《TAIPEI TIMES》US seeks to boost trade with Taiwan. BOLSTERING TIES: The US is ‘developing an ambitious road map for trade negotiations’ with Taiwan and plans to continue transits through the Taiwan Strait, a US official said. AFP and Reuters, WASHINGTON and TAIPEI. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday expressed “sincere gratitude” toward the US for taking “concrete actions” to maintain security and peace in the Taiwan Strait and the region, after the White House on Friday said it would boost trade with Taiwan and insist on the right of air and sea passage in the area in response to China’s “provocative” behavior. A new trade plan is to be unveiled within days, while US forces are to transit the Taiwan Strait in the next few weeks, US National Security Council Indo-Pacific Coordinator Kurt Campbell told reporters in a teleconference.”

https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/breakingnews/4024663

Even though I have little interest in partisan domestic politics in the US and in the Taiwan Republic, I have repeatedly warned that chaos in American democracy carries grave danger for global democracies – particularly for vulnerable frontline democracies like Ukraine, Baltic States, and the Taiwan Republic. A weakened and chaotic United States makes a military attack on Ukraine and Taiwan more tempting to Moscow and Beijing. But it also carries other public policy risks, such as the inability of the US to think strategically and to lead a pro-democracy global economic order.

The world history level big picture: the core of this modern struggle between democracies and autocracies, the “Third World War,” is geoeconomics. Globalization 1.0, circa 1980 to 2019, entailed self-defeating deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy multinationals led by the US, defunding of these democracies, and opening their door to global strategic corruption. In the aggregate, trillions in profits were made, but creating highly unstable polities with economic inequalities, all creating the precondition for populist extremisms and democratic instability. This Globalization 1.0 has also transferred trillions in funds and technological know-how to modern autocracies – Putin’s regime, and Xi’s Chinese communist war machine. This is the first time in world history where the leading superpower, the US and its allies, voluntarily funded and shared technological know-how with their enemies. For decades!

Compared with the flashy military scaremongering headlines, trade negotiations are boring. Yet these trade talks between the US and the Taiwan Republic, and eventually a broader regional free and fair trade pact between the US and its democratic allies, are as important to Taiwanese, American, and regional security as missile defense. Hence we return to the idea that stable and healthy American democracy with two pro-democracy parties is vital to Taiwanese and world democracy security. An American democracy that is confident and outward-facing, not paranoid and isolationist, is key to actively creating a pro-democracy and pro-US national interest, free and fair trade Globalization 2.0. A global economic system where trade and economic activities are tied to their service to democratic consolidation and human rights, and minimizing the phenomenon of the democracies directly funding autocracies such as the Chinese communists. A global democratic supply chain that enhances the prosperity and relative equality of democracies will also promote healthier, less acrimonious, non-extremists democracies.

On the Taiwan Republic specifically. Ever since 1945 the consensus between the China CCP and the China KMT is to turn the “Taiwan Question” into a domestic problem – i.e., a civil war between the two China political parties. So anything that the US, Japan, and NATO can do to internationalize Taiwan – particularly in trade, science, education, space, agriculture, media, and arts – the more Taiwan’s security is enhanced.

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Geostrategery and geoeconomics classrooms: U.S. considers crackdown on memory chip makers in China.

Aircraft carriers and counterstrikes missiles matter a lot. But this is the key battlespace in the war between the US and its allies and communist China. The US is trying to lead a four-nation microchip coalition — US, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, watch this space closely. Also, as a multidimensional war, we will require decades of thoughtful, positive policy domestically — on education, and jobs, manufacturing, and democratic supply chains, immigration reforms, etc. This is why I focus on strategic corruption and the health of American democracy. No weapons, FBI agents, nor laws ensuring technology no longer flows to China will help if American democracy falls to armed fascist militiamen. 10.8.2022

https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-considers-crackdown-memory-chip-makers-china-2022-08-01/

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Geostrategery and journalism classrooms: Information warfare and stop being useful idiots.

Geostrategery and journalism classrooms. Information warfare and stop being useful idiots. I pay so much attention to information warfare because the major bad actors — Putin’s kleptocracy, American fascists, and the Chinese communists — employ similar information warfare tactics, and western journalism, academia, and other liberal democratic institutions are slow to respond — and in many cases, become force multipliers for enemies of democracy.

Case in point, the Chinese communist narrative amplified by western journalists and academia, that Speaker Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan Republic is “provocative.” And to be cookie-cutter about it, the US congressional delegation that just landed in Taipei is “also provocative.” Not only have US and global legislative delegations always visited Taiwan. If this narrative is accurate, which is more provocative — these administrative 737s flying into Taipei? Or, this understudied moment from June 2021 — during the height of the vaccine crisis manufactured by the China CCP and China KMT, three US senators flew directly from a US Air Force base in South Korea to Taiwan’s Songshan Air Force Base — on a gigantic C-17 strategic transport.

Wasn’t the message the US delivered to Beijing and the region clear enough? The US military may land in Taipei anytime it wishes. What carried three senators in 2021 could easily ferry hundreds of main battle tanks and thousands of soldiers. In the realm of messages deemed ‘provocative’ to the hypersensitive Chinese communists, if we follow Chinese communist and western media and academia narrative, which ought to have provoked a barbaric Chinese communist military response?

Big picture/important lessons — compare western media and academia amplifying Moscow, fascists, and Beijing disinformation and propaganda, and understand that the crisis of western liberal democracy is not that our enemies are that strong, but that we are muddle-headed and ineffective in protecting our own democratic values. 16.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Taiwan Republic 台灣国 and world history classrooms: 1996 v. 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis – President Tsai and evolving Taiwanese national identity. 中華民囯台灣七十三年。主權互不隸屬。反共保台。

Because Taiwan Republic only appears in the western press in relation to geostrategery, “Chinese communist tensions,” and computer microchips, most English language analyses of Taiwan have been filtered through American and Chinese imperialist lenses. One of the greatest peaceful democratic revolutions engineered by the democratically elected president of Taiwan Dr. Tsai (LSE, Ph.D.) is to move from Taiwan Republic’s founding father President Lee Teng-hui’s formulation “RoC [in] Taiwan 中華民囯在台灣” to “RoC [as] Taiwan 中華民囯台灣” – and to have this formulation accepted by the leading world powers of US, Japan, and NATO – and accepted as a solid governing majority in Taiwan.

The 1996 Chinese communist missile crisis occurred on the eve of Taiwan’s first democratic presidential election – President Lee led Taiwan from the era of China KMT foreign dictatorship to Taiwanese democracy. Dr. Lee had to balance between the new, fragile democratic era and his role as the inheritor of CCK’s China KMT dictatorial party-state while facing Chinese communist belligerence and muddle-headed US policy.

In contrast, the 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis – though the Chinese military is stronger – has occurred in a very different environment. Since 1996 Taiwan’s democracy has peacefully transferred power between political parties twice – DPP to China KMT; China KMT back to DPP. More significant: Dr. Tsai is the first democratically elected president wherein during her second term her level of support has remained above fifty percent.

The impressive global and domestic re-engineering President Tsai has accomplished is this. During her October 10, 2021 speech she demarcated the differences between the “status quo” by the China CCP and the China KMT – one China and Taiwan is subjugated by China; versus the Lee-Tsai formulation, where the status quo is defined as RoC Taiwan for the last 73 years, and the boundaries between PRC and RoC Taiwan are that neither entity has claims of sovereignty over the other. Even more important, Taiwan RoC, RoC Taiwan, or Taiwan Republic, the key notion offered by President Tsai is democratic sovereignty – only the 23 million citizens living in Taiwan have the right to democratically choose their own government and chart their own future.

This Tsai formulation, RoC Taiwan 73 years, is a modernized version of the Lee Special State to State. The big difference is, unlike Lee’s earlier attempt, the Tsai formulation was not rejected by the major world powers of the US, Japan, and NATO. President Tsai then followed through on this major October 10th policy speech with a speech at the CCK Museum where she politically separated the younger dictator Chiang from his father dictator Chiang Kai-shek – endorsing CCK’s principle of “Anti-communism, protecting Taiwan” as a part of the “RoC Taiwan 73 years democratic sovereignty.” Another important step is to solidify a stable domestic democratic majority. From the October 10, 2021 speech to the CCK Museum speech, President Tsai has balanced historical memory, democratic consolidation, and compromises in national identity, with great power geostrategery.

The most remarkable manifestation of this national identity re-engineering from President Tsai is her convincing pan-green supporters to embrace RoC Taiwan, the flag, and the national military. As a young college student in the American midwest, I remember reading “outside the dictatorship party” 黨外 anti-China KMT/pro-Taiwan independence magazines, and the Taiwan military is conflated as the China KMT military – the enforcers of the dictatorship. In the 1980s it was not uncommon for these writers to advocate against the US selling arms to Taiwan, because this was seen by them to be selling arms to the China KMT dictatorship. So to see, during the 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis, so many pan blue-red China KMT supporters attack the Taiwanese military, and the pan-green DPP supporters show the RoC flag and support the military – a seismic, foundational national revolution. Will have an impact on Taiwanese democracy, regional order, and the US Indo-Pacific geostrategery for decades to come. Missiles and jet fighters and submarines are paramount to Taiwan’s national security. A stable, peaceful, governing majority in Taiwanese national identity focusing on democracy is equally important to Taiwanese national security and stability in the Indo-Pacific. 16.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History 台灣與世界歷史. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

World history and geostrategery classrooms: The 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis and connecting the global dots

Geostrategery and world history classrooms. Connect the dots. Important to understand reports of planned US-India joint military maneuver near India’s border with China, US-Japan military planning on a Taiwan ‘contingency’, alongside US Forces RoK General’s comments this week on his forces’ ability to respond to Chinese communist’s aggression against the Taiwan Republic. The Chinese communists menaced South Korea this week on its THAAD missile defense program. The free world is responding not merely because of “Taiwan tension,” it is beginning to understand that the China Threat is systemic and global.

This is why it is important to pay attention to the report that the Chinese communists plan to continue menacing maneuvers across the Taiwan Strait median line. If this occurs, US and Japanese naval assets will be permanently stationed inside-near the strait – it will be yet another Chinese communist paradox, perhaps their greatest since their interference in the Korean War in 1950 which brought the US Seventh Fleet into the Taiwan Strait. This is not just about Taiwan, this is about the global maritime empire led by the US Navy. And crossing the Taiwan Strait median line (invented by the US military!) is just the latest in the Chinese communists challenging the US naval world order– claiming the South and East Seas, claiming Taiwan Strait, closing off the Yellow and Bo Seas. 9.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed immediately.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

World history and geostrategery classrooms: Taiwan Strait ‘median line,’ and the 2022 Chinese communist missile crisis

World history and geostrategery classrooms. The ‘median line’ dividing the Taiwan Strait was drawn by the US military. As are the Taiwanese, Japanese, and Korean ADIZs. Experts and politicians have a vested interest in complication and being confusing – cutting through all the jargon and acronym, from before the end of the Pacific War, the US Navy considers Taiwan and Pescadores within its first island chain. And given the nature of the postwar global maritime empire enforced by the US Navy, everything else (One China Principle v. Policy; Hundred Years of National Humiliation; Formal and informal relations ….) is secondary. Now that the Chinese Communist Party has repeatedly challenged the US Navy Taiwan ADIZ and the Taiwan Strait median line, watch what the US and Japanese Navies do next.

This current Chinese communist missile crisis is not just, or even primarily, about Taiwan, and it certainly has little to do with Speaker Pelosi. It is about the Globalization 1.0 order breaking down. It is about the Chinese communists challenging the maritime global order imposed by the US Navy. It is about dictators Putin and dictator Xi’s domestic calculation that a poorer and disconnected from the global democracies reality is better for their dictatorship preservation. Watch India (joint US-Indian maneuver near the Chinese communist border), Sri Lanka (financial crisis caused by the Chinese communists and US-India reaction), Africa, South Pacific (Taiwan, Japan Coast Guards and navies, and the US Australian forces), Korea (THAAD and chips), Japan (Chinese communists not recognizing Japanese EEZ, a normal constitution), Philippines, and ASEAN nations. China Threat is another way to say a Third World War – a geoeconomic and geostrategic global struggle – my reading list in just five days has taken me, following American, Taiwanese, Japanese, European, and Chinese diplomatic and military officials, jockeying for positions in these critical areas.

Also, often missed inside the US are the connections between major domestic-geoeconomic policies of President Biden and the China and Russia threats to the US. Pay close attention to the massive bills President Biden and the Democrats have passed – pandemic relief (social welfare safety nets, income inequality, reigning in domestic oligarchs), infrastructure, CHIPs, Inflation-Climate (education, democracy enhancing supply chains, defunding the Chinese Communist Party and re-funding American and allied democracies) they are slowly beginning the trend to reverse four decades of deliberate defunding of American democracy, 1980-2022. American and allied geoeconomic policies are the most critical front in the world war to prevent strategic corruption, and win this war against the China Threat. 10.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed immediately.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Taiwan Republic in world history and global studies

End of Globalization 1.0, strategic corruption, the American global maritime empire, and a new era of global instability while moving towards a democracy and human rights-focused Globalization 2.0

[Edited reply to a student writing with questions about Speaker Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan Republic, and the Chinese communists’ typical belligerent response.]

The issue of Taiwan is related to your broader questions. In quick summary, this is how:

  1. World history and global studies context. Because America is not world history/globe studies literate, we often only focus on episodic things like Pelosi visiting Taiwan Republic, or communist China making war threats (yet again!), history and global context-free. Taiwan is just a tiny dot in a broader world history scale issue — I’ve called it Globalization 1.0 before, recently I have conceptualized it as the postwar maritime empire built by the US Navy.
  2. Globalization 1.0 and the US global maritime empire. The US is the first empire in world history to figure out that occupying land/people is impossible. So we have a huge navy, we have allies and international organizations (UN, WTO, World Bank, WHO, NATO, EU ….) and the rules the US has imposed are simple — relatively open global access to labor, raw material, manufacturing, and markets. And for the US, the big no-no is whenever anyone claims the international sea is not open to all. Say, the Taiwan Strait. Or in the case of the Chinese communists, claiming the South and East Seas along with the Taiwan Strait, while making military-strategic moves into other major harbors and canals.
  3. Russia and Communist China; Taiwan Republic and Ukraine. Regional powers like Russia and China never liked this American world order, but when America was in its primacy, they tolerated it. Russia adjusted poorly and has been far more aggressive in trying to upend this global order and western democracies. From 1980 to 2019 communist China made trillions from this American world order and imported western technology that greatly enhanced its military power. Between Ukraine and Taiwan, we see evidence that Moscow and Beijing’s temporary acceptance of this American world order are over.
  4. Seeing like a western imperialist. Western experts often overestimate our role. I think we are missing some of the pictures here. I think both Putin and Xi have independently decided that they’d rather be poorer, with less access to western technology, than risk globalization endangering their dictatorships.
  5. The defunding of American democracy, 1980-2019, strategic corruption, and the end of Globalization 1.0. America and other western democracies started defunding their democratic institutions in the 1980s with tax cuts for the wealthy and multinationals, deregulation, financialization of the economy, and cutting funds and regulations from institutions important for democracy, such as journalism and education. The rise of American and western populism/fascism leading to a decline of our democracy – led by domestic and foreign oligarchs – is adding pressure on the Globalization 1.0 world order. We are in an era with major challenges from abroad and at home, and they are linked-related.
  6. Taiwan Republic is just one of the dozens of global flashpoints in the struggle between America and its democratic allies and communist China. So seen in this world history and global context — yesterday I noted that while the headlines are Taiwan, the US and its allies, and communist China in seven days have been jockeying for positions from Africa to the Middle East, Sri Lanka to the South Pacific, South Korea to Japan. Taiwan is a flashpoint, but merely a dot in a broader global struggle between China and the US.
  7. Re-funding American democracy is key. Which gets us back to your observations about the CHIPS Act. My conservative estimation is that when America started defunding its democracy in 1980 (the irony is this, President Reagan spent much on the military – a good decision in my estimation – which was like putting the best lock on the front door; but he also deregulated key economic institutions and had tax cuts for the wealthy and multinationals while defunding institutions important to democracy, which was like opening the back door for strategic corruption from foreign malevolent forces like the Russians and Chinese communist and the Gulf oligarchs to corrode American democracy), from 1980 to 2022 many trillions flowed from American pro-democracy institutions to Chinese communist, Russian, Mideast, and American oligarchs. This is not even to mention the decades and trillions lost from the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Imperfect as President Biden may be, he is the first president since Reagan to put real money behind re-funding American democracy — from pandemic relief to infrastructure to CHIPS to inflation/climate change, about 4 trillion. While importantly, trying to decrease the wealth gap among American citizens.
  8. When I talk about the “Third World War” people think I mean a modern version of WW2. In this modern war, it is universal healthcare, resolving student debt, regulating news ownership and social media algorithm manipulations, making sure citizens have dignity and social safety nets so that extremist dangerous ideas hold no appeal, and not funding by the trillions of foreign dictatorships like Moscow and Beijing, that’s the main battlefield.
  9. Summary. The most important change in America is this. The foolish and self-defeating Globalization 1.0 premise that capital should flow without regard for national borders, democratic values, and national interests/security is over. So while re-funding American democracy with cash, regulation, and taxation is important, even more critical is having two pro-democracy American political parties that can agree on this basic premise — that foreign and domestic economic policies must always address two questions: “Is this good for American and other democracies?” “Is this good for American and allies’ national security?” 12.8.2022

© Taiwan in World History. This site grants open access for educational and not-for-profit use. Maps and illustrations are borrowed under educational and not-for-profit fair use. If you are the rights holder and prefer to not have your work shared, please email TaiwanWorldHistory (at) Gmail (dot) com and the content will be removed immediately.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized